Jupiter ascending - 4/10
Ii dau nota atat de mare pentru efecte. Povestea a fost penal de siropoasa si trasa de par, provocandu-mi in stomac reactii convulsive apropiate de voma.
Jupiter ascending - 4/10
Ii dau nota atat de mare pentru efecte. Povestea a fost penal de siropoasa si trasa de par, provocandu-mi in stomac reactii convulsive apropiate de voma.
Iancu si FC Timisoara, prima grupare mafiota care a primit o mica pedeapsa. FRF-DNA 1-0.
OTELUL GALATI SUPERCAMPIOANA 2010-2011!!!
Aici este criza economica a Romaniei: http://www.porcisme.ro/
Eu cred c-a fost la nivelul lui Avatar, dar mie Avatar mi-a placut mai mult ca avea mai multe interactiuni, deci mai mult dinamism, si asta te atrage sa-l vezi de mai multe ori decat te-ar atrage sa vezi Interstellar. Plus ca anul viitor cand apare Avatar 2, ma mai uit o data la Avatar 1 inainte sa ma duc la cinema in orasul vecin, ca sa-l am proaspat in cap; pe cand Interstellar nu mai are sequal, e one time experience and that's it!
The difference between a good and an awesome diplomat is the ability to reconcile the arrogant assholes with the scardy whiners, it's almost an art really!
I know because I'M BOTH!
Avatarul a fost un film reusit in principal datorita lui Cameron. Se pricepe omul.
Dar ca dramatism si impact emotional, a fost la ani lumina de Interstellar. Avatar a fost previzibil de la un capat la celalalt.
Iancu si FC Timisoara, prima grupare mafiota care a primit o mica pedeapsa. FRF-DNA 1-0.
OTELUL GALATI SUPERCAMPIOANA 2010-2011!!!
Aici este criza economica a Romaniei: http://www.porcisme.ro/
Si Avatar tot one-time experience e. Filmele nu vor avea legatura intre ele din cate stiu. Singura diferenta e ca Cameron e genulcare mulge vaca pana moare, iar Nolan face lucrurile mai mult pentru arta.
Interstellar este ok, mult marketing pentru el. De nota 8, nu l-as cumpara sa-l revad. Pana sa-l vad, citind alte comentarii eram convins ca ia Oscarul, acum sunt ok ca nu l-a luat.
Efecte speciale comsi-comsa, povestea ok, desi nu prea originala, vezi Star Trek Generations, cam aceeasi idee.
Inception, imho, este superior lui Interstellar, teme diferite dar Nolan a facut treaba exceptionala cu Inception.
beleafer
nu bre, ci doar la vreme te pricepi
beleafer
ei pe naiba, daca nu te racaia nu mentionai, simples. mai si minti.
revenind la inter.. cum spuneam : nu prea ai inteles mai nimic.
The difference between a good and an awesome diplomat is the ability to reconcile the arrogant assholes with the scardy whiners, it's almost an art really!
I know because I'M BOTH!
sunt unele chestii aici pe care nu le impartasesc dar icemanul este exact in categoria in rosu.
enjoy:
Christopher Nolan’s overwhelming, immersive and time-bending space epic ‘Interstellar’ makes Alfonso Cuarón’s ‘Gravity’ feel like a palate cleanser for the big meal to come. Where ‘Gravity’ was brief, contained and left the further bounds of the universe to our imagination, ‘Interstellar’ is long, grand, strange and demanding – not least because it allows time to slip away from under our feet while running brain-aching ideas before our eyes. It’s a bold, beautiful cosmic adventure story with a touch of the surreal and the dreamlike, and yet it always feels grounded in its own deadly serious reality.
It’s hard to talk about the story without ruining its slow drip of surprises. So let’s be vague. Cooper (Matthew McConaughey) lives with his family – his father-in-law (John Lithgow) and two young kids – in a not-too-distant future where living off huge fields of corn is the only business around. Dust storms brew, and there’s an apocalyptic vibe, as if the Depression of the 1930s had been transplanted to a dying Earth.
Cooper has a strong bond with his daughter, Murph (Mackenzie Foy). But when this former pilot is given a chance to head a mission into space, he grabs it. It’s all very Messianic. This rough-and-ready everyman’s destiny is to join a secret project to save the Earth directed by the ageing Professor Brand (Michael Caine). And so he blasts into orbit in the company of Brand’s daughter (Anne Hathaway) and two other scientists (Wes Bentley, David Gyasi). This is no bus hop to the Moon: their aim is to slip through a wormhole near Saturn and search for other planets capable of sustaining life. Let’s just say that their return ticket is flexible.
You might understand the science (influenced by the involvement of physicist Kip Thorne), but the chances are you won’t. Yet still ‘Interstellar’ inspires trust, and all the formulae and ample talk of wormholes is best taken as mood music. Also, despite the cosmic canvas, ‘Interstellar’ is still one of the most earthbound films to date from Nolan, and the one most in tune with its emotions. Even with Nolan’s early hit ‘Memento’ (2000), before he took on ‘The Dark Knight Trilogy’ (2005-2012) and ‘Inception’ (2010), we knew we were exploring fairly chilly movie worlds. Nolan is ably assisted in this respect by a cast you can believe in. The real star is McConaughey: his earthy grit and family-man vulnerability are well placed: we believe his tears when the reality of multi-decade space travel sets in. Meanwhile the father-daughter relationship between Caine and Hathaway hits home with a sharp brutality.
And brutal is the word: this is a sharp, tense experience. There are some staggering visual coups: an ocean rising up to form the largest wave imaginable; a space ship floating past the rings of Saturn; a late scene which turns our perceptions of space and time on their head. But alongside these thrills are moments of intense danger, and Nolan makes us feel the threat, honing in on mechanical problems and other everyday risks.
Parallels to Stanley Kubrick’s ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’ are more than obvious; they’re ingrained: we’re invited to wonder at staggering imagery and listen to unnerving silence as well as Hans Zimmer’s organ-heavy score. Nolan even offers his own spin on Kubrick’s HAL 9000 by giving us a shiny, walking robot that’s by far the cutest thing on display. But where ‘Interstellar’ is more Spielberg than Kubrick is in the strained family relationships at its heart. Yet the final tone is all Nolan’s: the film’s devastating emotional strands refuse to give way to empty sentiment and are embedded in a fractured sense of a nightmare unfolding before the eyes. You’re better advised to come armed with an encyclopaedia, not a hankie, although in a seriously imaginative climactic scene – almost impossible to explain – science and sorrow are powerfully united.
Often when we talk about cinema being a ‘ride’, we’re hinting at a lack of substance, an absence of ideas, an opportunity to switch off. Not so here. ‘Interstellar’ is, in large part, a spectacle. But it also asks you to think hard, look hard and urges you to return for more. Why only ask for the stars when you can have moons, distant planets, extra dimensions, lectures on physics and a sobering shot of terror? ‘Interstellar’ has it all
Cum zice? urges you to return for more
INDEED
Mihaidascalescu - poti sa ne mai dai copy paste la inca 3 pagini, daca nu ne-a placut Interstellar, nu ne-a placut. Nu inteleg de ce te agiti atata. Ultima data cand am cercetat, oamenii aveau voie sa aiba opinii diferite, mai ales cand este vorba de ceea ce tine de artisitc.
"Nobody objects to a woman being a good writer or sculptor or geneticist if at the same time she manages to be a good wife, good mother, good looking, good tempered, well groomed and unaggressive."
Ce zice Eddy e problema lui, eu prefer sa-i dau pace cand da notele alea imbecile de 1-4 la filme supramediocre sau uneori chiar bune de tot.
Mie mi-a placut Interstellar, de aia l-am si vazut de 2 ori si tot s-au luat de mine; Doamne feri sa fac ca voi ca nu scap 2 pagini de ei!
Avatarul l-am vazut de 4 ori, nu e asta baiu, si-o sa-l mai vad cand am chef sa vad o lume total straina prin ochii unui om simplu, schilod dar cu inima mare, inima ce-i decodeaza aceasta lume drept mult mai familiara decat cea umana meschina si perversa, pe care a inteles-o prea bine si de care s-a saturat deja demult!
PS: Ar fi nasol sa nu fie conexiune intre actiuni in Avatare.
Last edited by Johnny D; 2nd July 2015 at 16:14.
The difference between a good and an awesome diplomat is the ability to reconcile the arrogant assholes with the scardy whiners, it's almost an art really!
I know because I'M BOTH!
daca e vorba de opinii diferite nu-I bai.
cind vorbesti prostii la genul
e bai.
normal ca nu le bag filmul pe git dar daca fac un pic de educatie cu ei, nu strica zic eu.
daca tu nu ai inteles ceva si vine cineva si-ti explica ii dai in cap sau ii multumesti? sau te doare in cot.
Bai englezule, tu ai vazut Star Trek Generations ??? Da sau nu??
beleafer